|
|||
![]() The City of Bath, location of "Wessex University," home base of the Bonekickers team. The script introduces the Georgian city as a “blanket of bright stone nestled in the cleave of an English valley.” |
|||
|
|||
| Call
Yourself A Bonekicker? The BBC commissioning editor said Bonekickers would “take history and archaeology and make it sexy, accessible and exciting”. The series debuted to coincide with National Archaeology Week 2008 in July which included an event called “Be A Bonekicker”. The U. Of Bristol, whose Head of Archaeology Dr Mark Horton provided ‘official supervision’ of depictions of archaeological practice, were originally happy to be credited onscreen – there being an obvious student-recruitment potential. However within weeks such links were being played down. One archaeologist who emailed me said both Bristol University and the Salisbury-based public-education trust Wessex Archaeology were soon desperately trying to distance themselves from it, due to its notoriety over the ‘rubbish’ way it portrays the profession (cf the team routinely wreck sites and destroy relics). In fact, early on archaeologists set up a 200-member Facebook site called “Bonekickers Is An Embarrassment To Archaeology!” whose mission statement was “defending the honour of our profession” against this “farce.” The academics’ fear is no doubt that students will be recruited who want to play at archaeology like the onscreen squad, and these wannabe bonekickers will go at sites like children opening Xmas presents, ripping them open and then abandoning them when nothing sensational is found within the first 5 minutes. For such instant finds happen in each episode of the series, but not in reality, where a dig can take weeks, months, even years of painstaking work. (C4’s documentary series Time Team, which began with quick “salvage” digs just before the builders moved onsite, is no doubt the quick-fix inspiration here.) While it claims to be "CSI meets Indiana Jones,” the CSI-type forensic-archaeology procedural aspect is here ridiculously speeded-up. Overall, Bonekickers is the Famous Five approach to archaeology. Unlike
the Famous Five (4 kids and
a dog), the team of 4 don’t
have an actual dog to help
dig holes and locate clues,
but they do have an academic
minder (played by Michael
Maloney), whose name is Dr
Daniel (rhymes with spaniel)
Mastiff. In each episode,
the maverick team of 4 (Mastiff
shows up later, to rescue
them in his dogged managerial
way) are sent to an already-excavated
site (thus saving some screen
time). Within minutes, they
discover the site the key
to a long-unsolved historical
mystery. Following clues,
they soon piece together a
scenario (which archaeological
evidence alone could in fact
never support) and pursue
it to its dangerous conclusion,
for sinister forces quickly
appear and menace the team.
To bring the trail of evidence to life, we see the relics morphing over time à la The Da Vinci Code film, with a CGI-enhanced flashback to the moments before the relics were buried. The four run into jeopardy (to use the generic TV-producer jargon) from some modern-day vested-interest group who are somehow onto the find in a flash and who menace them throughout, burying people alive or beheading them, that sort of thing. (As BBC publicity put it, the finds “unlock dangers and mysteries in the present.”) They battle these dangers, and somehow (given their unheroic passivity when faced with danger) win out. Then (abandoning the site and any associated paperwork), the team go off to the pub bickering about their sex lives and who’s bonking whom. (The BBC site tried promoting an online tie-in ‘drinking game’.) There was also an ongoing inter-personal crisis to do with obsession on the part of the team leader, lecturer Dr Gillian Magwilde, whom publicity describes as “a fiesty Celt” - presumably to explain her general sulkiness. (Scots actress Julie Graham is now the mother-figure in BBC1’s Survivors remake, which is reportedly causing people to have nightmares that not only will their loved ones die in a plague, but they will end up with her bossing them around.) As the press release put it, "Running through the series is a greater puzzle that Gillian keeps to herself for fear of ridicule: the hunt for the greatest treasure in the history of Humankind [sic], a hunt that drove her brilliant mother insane and a hunt that pits her wits against her academic nemesis – the arrogant, urbane TV historian, Professor Daniel Mastiff ... – and that will culminate at the end of series one in a desperate race for glory which may destroy her in the process." (Note the reference to "series one" - obviously a 2nd series was originally planned as part of what scriptwriters call the story "arc.") In response to the onslaught of complaints, the series’s archaeo advisor Dr Horton, who is what they call a ‘TV archaeologist’ (a co-presenter on BBC’s Coast series etc), posted a rebuttal on the BritArch forum. He said Bonekickers was really ‘a drama that uses the past to make some comment on the present’, with the archaeology just ‘a vehicle’ that needs to be ‘bent’ in places to make the drama work. He added those who had a bone to pick with it were merely a few hundred “anoraks” out of 6.8 million viewers. He said those criticizing it are humourless and don’t understand it is a comedy. He said the casual way bones were treated onscreen (befitting the series’s title) was immaterial, as they were merely plastic props. He explained “the massive public outcry” was simply because people didn’t expect what was coming, and that was “the real fun bit”, tee hee. People clearly didn’t expect to see, in the first episode, a modern-day evangelical Christian order beheading a Muslim, done on the basis the Templars did this during the Crusades. (Well, if not, they did it in that Ridley Scott film about the Crusades anyway – same thing, really.) My own guess is the producers were also emulating BBC’s previous gang-of-cool-young-professionals drama, Spooks. This went into the headlines overnight when in episode one, a woman had her head stuck in a hot chip fryer by nasty fascists. The series got immediate attention, and recruitment applications shot up for the real MI5, which has exploited the interest since on its official website.
The writers seem to have thought
they could script it with
a spoof subtext, which they
could point to, as they did
in defence against anyone
who had a bone to pick with
them. There is the ‘doggy’
in-joke already mentioned
from the Famous Five. The
team’s oldest character
and closest match to an “Indiana
Bones” figure (he wears
an Aussie drovers coat and
matching hat), is the "encyclopaedic
but terminally louche Professor
Gregory Parton",
nicknamed "Dolly"
Parton. The actor playing
him says Parton is based on
the series archaeological
adviser, ‘who literally
froths at the mouth.’
(Who could that possibly
be?) The series title almost
seems a joke - as Guardian
TV critic Nancy Banks-Smith
pointed out, it’s “only
one syllable away from being
Bonkers" (say Bonekickers
quickly over and over). In
the event, the headline writers
mainly went for puns based
on kicking –as in ‘Bonekickers
Gets Another Kicking.’
Despite the claim all but a few hundred ‘anoraks’ out of 6.8 million viewers loved it, this was the initial series viewing figure, which quickly dropped off, while reviews have been consistently negative in regard to both plot and character. Horton claimed the show‘s “wooden characters” were simply a short-hand way of creating strong, idiosyncratic leads. Comments were often negative even on the official “fan” site the BBC set up. (Wikipedia has an account of the series's reception here). Bones Of Contention The
programme also dug itself
into a large hole through
its official publicity, which
foolishly claimed Bonekickers
is ‘Based in fact.’
This predictably backfired
on the BBC just as Dan Brown’s
similar “Fact”
claim in his Da Vinci
Code preface had. The
BBC press release implied
the script claims were backed
by academia (or should we
use the series' own term acamedia?):
"Based in fact, the
series has on board the expertise
of Professor Mark Horton,
Head of Archaeology at Bristol
University, a specialist in
the archaeology of historical
societies around the world
and Bonekickers consultant
on the factual evidence and
background to the relics featured
in each episode.")
The statement added: "Set
against the backdrop of Bath,
a city steeped in 3,000 years
of history, each week the
team uncovers a compelling
mystery from the past that
tells viewers something profound
and revelatory about the present.
Archaeology has never been
so dramatic... our archaeologists
investigate huge mysteries
that may start in the past,
but which are very much still
alive and dangerous today."
In the 6 episodes, the team uncovered 6 conspiracy and coverup ‘secrets’ at sites around the West Country. These were to do with the True Cross and modern ‘Knights Templar’ (a real church with KT graves was shown); Boudicca’s supposed secret love affair with a Roman officer and the Great Fire of Nero’s Rome (a lost cave under Bath’s Roman baths), American Revolutionary War era slave-trade secrets (Bristol Channel etc), a relic that could have ended WWI, and finally Excalibur (Glastonbury plus Wells Cathedral and Bishop’s Palace)."From the excavation of murdered 18th-century slaves to the possible discovery of the True Cross, each episode is a window on a period of history but, more importantly, a reflection on how we live now." All the ‘historical’ scenarios presented are nonsensical, merely attempts to pile up stock modern-conspiracy situations from a hodge-podge of genres. (For an earlier feature I wrote on how such potboilers as The Da Vinci Code were really crossover genre products that were also "film-friendly," see 'The Da Vinci Formula'.) As co-star Adrian Lester, who wanted a 2nd series to explore overseas locales, put it, it’s "CSI meets Indiana Jones ... the crime procedural show, there's science, conspiracy theory – and there's a big underlying mystery.") For example, in one episode, some corpses are found inside a British WWI tank buried at Verdun (“A war crime!” exclaims Dr Magwilde). Clues found in a diary lead to the finding of Joan Of Arc’s tomb nearby, with skeleton intact (notwithstanding the fact she was burnt at Rouen and her remains thrown in the Seine). Supposedly this was “a weapon to win the war.” The scenario is that if the tomb had been found in 1916, WWI would’ve at once ended via a French-German anti-British alliance. So all the British tank crew who had found the tomb, who all happened to be archaeologists and associates and antiwar activists, were murdered by “patriots” from the British Officer Class, who buried them inside the tank. This supposedly also explains the antagonism the team face from a party of German archaeologists, someone setting fire to the team’s tent etc., and the MOD’s ongoing cover-up ending with an Army officer lining up the team to be executed inside the tomb. Any real controversies (which certainly exist) over relics are of course avoided by the series, even down to the team composition. For while the team reflects Britain’s socio-cultural diversity due to the BBC’s role-modelling approach, with a strong female lead character and a team representing an ethnic cross-section of modern Britain, archaeology as a profession is known as traditionally a "blokish" one, until not long ago a no-go area for women career-wise. (An independent archaeology blog has spoken of the real hazards archaeologists face - a climate of professional anxiety which discourages disclosure of finds for years and even sees non-conforming websites being blocked or interfered with for fear they will lead to controversy or undue recognition of a junior.) The factual-basis claim also limited options for further story ideas, and the producers may have run out of possible scenarios they could claim as fact-based. The Times wondered ‘if there were any mysteries left the show could "dumb down".’ Script possibilities here are hemmed in by the Indiana Jones franchise, including the Young Indiana Jones TV series (which covered substantial ground historically speaking, with young Indie meeting TE Lawrence and so on), The Da Vinci Code, DVC’s nonfiction forerunner The Holy Blood, Holy Grail (whose 2 co-authors tried to sue DVC’s publishers) and dozens of post-DVC follow-ups. (There’s even a successful US TV forensics drama called Bones, co-produced by a forensic anthropologist and author, Kathy Reichs.) All these have used up a substantial number of plot ideas, and the co-authors, who created the award-winning Life On Mars and Ashes To Ashes and run an annual competition to raise TV-scriptwriting standards, obviously wouldn’t want to be accused of being unoriginal ... though they were anyway. The show’s official site actually began asking people to submit “Predictions and suggestions for season two”. Even if there’s been a withdrawal of archaeological support, and the producers have run out of ideas, or even if this was just a publicity gimmick to retain interest between series, this was a desperate gamble. Accepting (never mind soliciting) story ideas needs careful handling and is usually done via a trusted intermediary like an established agent, lest it lead to litigation, and most mainstream producers won’t accept unsolicited storylines for this reason. Beyond
Bonekickers
|
Case
Study - Episode One, "Army
Of God"
To try to get some sense of the series, I got hold of the script of the first episode from the BBC. In "Army Of God," we meet the team, starting with Wessex U. lecturer Dr Gillian Magwilde (“Cargo pants, t-shirt and bomber jacket. Her hair an excited tangle of Celtic curls.”) Next is Professor Gregory Parton, a middle-aged prof with a “dirty twinkle in his eye” (“Think of him as Google with a beer-gut” is how he is introduced in the dialogue) Then there is Dr Ben Ergha, a 30-something Londoner of West African descent, who is described for some reason as “a geezer with a PhD.” ('geezer' being a now-dated term for an old bore.) Just joining the team is intern Vivienne, who proves to be there to spy on Dr Magwilde. (It turns out later she regards her as her long-lost sister, whom she never knew she had - if you see what I mean.) “Vivienne - the witch of Arthurian legend,” comments Dr M. presciently. Also, we meet their boss, the new Head of Archaeology at Wessex U., celebrity archeo-historian Prof. Daniel Mastiff, a promoter of the new concept of Acamedia i.e. Academia + Media. (On the wall of his office is a signed photograph of himself on a Time Team dig with Tony Robinson.) He specializes in the history of sex, being author of such historical bonk-busters as The Secret Perversions Of Henry VII, Yes Tonight Josephine: The Appetites Of An Emperor, and Sex Rites Of The Ancients: From Aztec Nuptials To The Virgin Molestations Of Caligula - “soon to be a Channel Five series.” (“Antiquity with tittys and front-bottoms” comments Magwilde). So much for scene-setting and character setup. Plotwise, they discover, during excavation of a new housing development, a piece of wood which tests indicate is “Two thousand year old wood from the Holy Land”. It is a relic of the True Cross, lost while being transported by the Knights Templar (“the Church’s SAS troops... Not to mention the mass slaughterers of countless Muslims”) to a secret location, as their order was being disbanded “when the Crusades went tits up.“ Flashback: The KTs are riding across Somerset when they are ambushed by ‘Saracens.’ Clues in a manuscript left by the Grandmontine order indicate the ‘Saracens’ are really “English Mercenaries in disguise ... in the pay of the Grandmontines .... the jammy sods.“ (Note: The Grandmontines were a hermit-like priestly order, not otherwise known for being jammy sods.) The idea is people would believe the Saracens had taken it back. “The Templars were being wiped out. The monks couldn’t trust them with the Cross. They made it look as though Saracens had killed them and taken the Cross back to the Holy Land.” (Not explained is why they would be sent so far to recover a relic not recognized by their own religion.) Adds Ben, “But that’s not the best bit. There’s organic residue in the wood. Soaked in. Like blood....” The blood is on an iron nail – could that be a clue? There’s some dialogue about finding possible DNA traces in the blood (though whose blood the sample would be matched up to is not mentioned). There’s a suggestion touching it effects a miracle health cure. “This is re-writing the books stuff," comments one of the team. (Though a more apt line turns up a few pages later: “Why turn a scientific enquiry into a Cecil B de Mille film?") They are menaced by right-wing Christian group The White Wings Alliance, who believe “the country needs to restore the values and principles of the Knights Templar.” They behead a Muslim to demonstrate this. (The script seems to have confused Templars with Crusaders and the BNP. The Templars if anything were considered by some to be too pro-Saracen – a number of them spoke Arabic and were suspected of having heretical Islam-inspired religious views.) The team head off in their Land Rover to fight it out with the White Wings head maniac at a remote KT church. They win out, go off to the pub, and throw the supposed relic of True Cross into the fireplace. Sorted. (Next on Bonekickers: “When the bodies of presumed slaves are found in the Bristol Channel, matters take a turn for the worse for the team as they encounter a conspiracy involving Maroons, the Siege of Yorktown and a man intending to be the first black President of America.” )
The Wessex Archaeo-Mystery Drama The region has of course been used in a number of novels and film-TV dramas built around some type of archaeological mystery. In
Fiction In
Film & TV Dramas
![]() A
late 'Quatermass' story
made for Thames TV, starring
John Mills, and set at a
(fictional) megalithic site
in the Wessex countryside
lacks the coherence and
excitement of Nigel Kneale's
original, London-set, Quatermass
And The Pit (where an archaeology
team unearths a 5 million
year old find which rewrites
human history and unleashes
uncontrollable forces),
this late entry in the series
limiting its archaeological
aspect to an astronomy tie-in.
|
||
|
|||