Wessex At War - On Screen
Local-Interest Film & TV Productions


Overlord (1975) Director Stuart Cooper, EMI / Imperial War Museum
In 1975, the UK’s notorious “30 Year Rule” whereby official documents are kept under wraps until their authors are safely dead, allowed key WWII records to be released, the end of the war having been 30 years before. The result was a series of more realistic treatments in print and on screen, both documentary and dramatised (such as A Bridge Too Far). One lesser known film, which won awards on its release (Silver Bear, Special Jury Prize, Berlin Film Fest, plus an Interfilm award) was Overlord, directed by Stuart Cooper and co-produced by the Imperial War Museum. For many years it was seen only on rare TV showings. Then, following a showing of some clips in a US cable channel documentary by John Cassavetes' daughter Xan, it was screened in 2004 in a restored print, at the 2004 Telluride Film Festival, where critic Roger Ebert praised the 20-year old film as the most remarkable discovery of the festival. In 2008 it was issued on DVD, first in the US (the director is American) in 2007 as part of the Criterion DVD Collection, complete with commentary and extras, and then in the UK in 2008, with a new R2 release announced for August.
I have to say at the outset that anyone expecting a conventional war film will be disappointed in this bleak, ultra-realist effort, and I gather this was the original idea, to provide a counterpoint to the conventional more heroic and spectacular view of war. The production approach was an ultra low budget one of using the Imperial War Museum’s vast store of archival footage, and shooting the connecting scenes of a young man’s training in matching style. (Cinematographer John Alcott, who worked with Kubrick, used 1940s lenses and the film stock was processed to match.)
The director spent 3 years trolling through war museum archive footage, and reportedly this makes up 27% of the 83 minute total. The criticism given in the Radio Times film guide blurb [possibly written by Barry Norman, whose father directed Ealing's 1958 Dunkirk] is that Cooper spent too much time looking at newsreel footage and not enough on the script, which is credited to the director and Christopher Hudson, who also created a novelisation of the script. (Having worked on the odd documentary where archival footage has to be integrated with newly-filmed material, I have to add this criticism is a bit glib - such an undertaking requires a carefully researched approach; it’s a bit like building a bridge, where both ends have to meet in the middle.) Cooper described in a 2008 Guardian article how the project developed:

I spent approximately 3,000 hours in that dark cell between 1971 and 1975, briefly interrupted by a couple of other projects. It was during the archival research that I developed the idea of a dramatised feature film about an English soldier who sees his first action on D-Day, interweaving the archive footage to expand and tell the story. More research in the museum's document section - reading letters and unpublished diaries of ordinary soldiers who saw action in the first wave of D-Day - refined the concept. ....
A writer, Christopher Hudson, then came aboard to continue the research and co-write the screenplay. What became apparent about the writing process was that until we knew what the film archive would support in narrative form, we could not write the screenplay. In other words, the film archive controlled what historical events our soldier's story would encompass. Once that was established, Hudson was able to dramatise some wonderful and totally original scenes extracted from diaries and letters of real servicemen. .... Overlord is not about military heroics; on the contrary, it is about the bleakness of sacrifice.

The film is a low-key documentary drama of the call-up [induction] and training of a young Everyman-figure soldier in 1944, ending with his embarkation for Operation Overlord - D-Day. (His name is Tom – I suppose ‘Tommy’ would’ve made the reference to ‘Tommy Atkins’ as the proverbial everyman British soldier too obvious.) The film covers his pre-embarkation training, from when he says goodbye to mum and dad and dog in London, taking a book (David Copperfield) to read on the train, arrives late after missing his train connection, gets told off by the senior soldier in charge of his barracks hut, and undergoes similar indignities in the months ahead. (There’s no tough drill sergeant character here – Tom is simply too low in the hierarchy.) The dialogue is minimalist – I think the idea is the young man cannot really articulate his mixed feelings of resignation and disappointment at what he anticipates will happen to him.
We see only his worm’s eye view of the war, which is as confined as can be. The tiny cast necessitated by a budget of under £100K accentuates the feeling of isolation - no sense of masses of young men who were all in the same situation. Some of the actuality footage intercut stretches the concept somewhat: arguably it represents scenes he would've seen in the cinema as newsreel footage; in fact what Cooper and the IWM wanted to show is the sort of footage the newsreel editors would've discarded as 'routine.' Instead, the archive footage does double duty to show the wider perspective. The films opens (after a minute of wait-for-it blank screen) with German aerial souvenir-style footage of captured capital cities Paris and Rome, with Hitler beaming down - an opening perhaps inspired by Riefenstahl's Nazi-propaganda documentary work, but not that effective here. Newly shot aerial footage from the last surviving Lanc [pictured at page top] of English countryside rolls on without any apparent rationale. Apparently this is on its way over to bomb Occupied Europe, but this is not given a narrative context .
However the intercutting generally introduces a poetic quality most documentaries and dramas miss, aided by a score by Paul Glass. That the young man has somehow acquired a premonition he will die soon is the basis of the film’s poignant lyrical quality. I’m not really giving away any plot secret here – Tom senses he will die, and accepts this, and the film is full of foreshadowing as he repeatedly sees in his mind’s eye himself falling on the beach. (This motif was also used in the poster, pictured right.) This starts early on, when the platoon are on their landing craft approaching the Normandy beach (a classic war-film setup, going back to Lewis Milestone's A Walk In The Sun, 1945). There are few flashbacks representing the protagonist’s memories of his home life, in the style of Losey's King & Country or Malick's The Thin Red Line. The juxtaposition of imagery is at times reminiscent of a scene in Menzel's 1967 WW2 Czech-resistance tragicomedy Closely Watched Trains, when the young protagonist is being taken away on a train by the SS to be shot as a hostage and his glimpses of passing trackside villages take on a 'last look' poignancy. We also get fantasy flash-forward sequences to do with his anticipated death, and that of a German soldier he imagines he encounters. There's also a fantasy followup to his meeting a girl at a dance, which provides the film's most original scene, where sex and death are surreally combined. The film is ultimately a tragedy, that of the many who never got to write their memoirs or reminisce about the war for years after, who saw next to nothing of actual combat, and didn't get to live a normal life either, being among the thousands of new recruits who fell on D-Day itself.
The local interest aspect is that the new scenes were mainly shot in Dorset, with Poole and the Kingston Lacy-Corfe estate credited. Most of these locations are deliberately anonymous, but Corfe Castle is quite recognizable in its own right, with the protagonist ascending to the top of the ruin at the end of act one [around 25 mins in], a scene revisited at the end for its obvious symbolic potential. The camp he trains at, which the script only identifies as somewhere on the South Coast, is thus presumably meant to be one of the many then in the vicinity (though the IMDB indicates Aldershot army barracks was used). The Normandy beach is portrayed by Studland, which is part of the same National Trust estate credited. Studland Beach was similar enough to Normandy ones that it was used in real-life training exercises watched by Churchill, Monty and Ike from an ad hoc blockhouse, Ft Henry [pictured at page bottom].


Overlord-Poster

Overlord-DVD-cover

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian Stirner, Overlord

 

Below: the view from the 30-meter long Fort Henry bunker above Studland beach, where in 1944 Ike, Monty, Churchill, and the King watched Exercise Smash, WW2's largest live-firing exercise, part of the preparations for D-Day. Studland was chosen as it resembled the main D-Day beaches.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return to Home Page